![us electoral population density map 2016 us electoral population density map 2016](https://p7.hiclipart.com/preview/795/553/202/united-states-map-us-presidential-election-2016-population-density-united-states.jpg)
It was also the fifth (and second consecutive) presidential election in which both major party candidates were registered in the same home state the others have been in 1860, 1904, 1920, 1940, and 1944. The Republican ticket, businessman Donald Trump and Indiana governor Mike Pence defeated the Democratic ticket of former secretary of state and First Lady of the United States Hillary Clinton and the junior senator from Virginia, Tim Kaine, in what was considered one of the biggest political upsets in American history. The 2016 United States presidential election was the 58th quadrennial presidential election, held on Tuesday, November 8, 2016. Russia investigation origins counter-narrative.However, because of seven faithless electors (five Democratic and two Republican), Trump received 304 votes and Clinton 227. On election night, Trump won 306 electors and Clinton 232. Numbers indicate electoral votes cast by each state and the District of Columbia.
![us electoral population density map 2016 us electoral population density map 2016](https://www.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/en-us/maps-we-love/70-election-2016-dot-density/election-2016-dot-density-related-1.jpg)
Red denotes states won by Trump/Pence and blue denotes those won by Clinton/Kaine. Might some American voters be starting to actually contemplate, rather than simply to react to, the vagaries of the 2016 election? “I’m a Republican,” started one series of tweets, “but I appreciate this map.Presidential election results map. “Rather than solid red, you see that basically the west is pretty freaking’ empty,” said a third. You’d think if the residents/citizens/voters in those areas believed the Republican theory/solution would work, those areas would be redder,” observed another reader. (Field aims to make a more user-friendly, zoomable, hi-res version when he gets the time in the next few weeks.)ĭoes the map tell us something “new” about the election? Overall, it doesn’t upend any key demographic conventional wisdom: The coasts and urban areas are mainly blue, and the rural Midwest in particular mainly red.īut online, some people seem be finding (for them at least) surprising nuance within this version’s gashes of red, and strips of blue: “Wow, having lived in Texas most of my life, it’s crazy seeing so much blue in the 4 largest cities (Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio),” noted “It’s quite interesting to ‘see’ that our ‘unsafe borders’ are so predominantly blue. To the uninitiated, populating a map with more than 130 million dots might seem almost like an act of magic, but once he’d gathered the needed data sets, Field says making this version of the map took him only … 35 minutes. To make this “dot-density” map, he used ArcGIS software from Esri, the company where he works, to illustrate information from two government data sets, one on election results and the other, the USGS’s “brilliant” national land-cover database. Reminds me of the piece I wrote about obsession with his county choropleth: /Bww032uAky- Thomas de Beus March 6, 2018 Original here: I just dropped a bad 'photoshop'. Field says Trump’s map isn’t “incorrect … there isn’t just one way of mapping the data” Field also wanted to make “a map that pushes the data into areas where people actually live.”įull credits to making the dot density (1dot = 1vote) map (on the right). In this new version, cartographer Kenneth Field wanted to include all votes - not just those of the victor in each area. That’s 65,844,954 blue dots for Hillary Clinton and 62,979,636 red dots for Donald Trump. Now, some 16 months later, perhaps the fairest and most nonpartisan version of the electoral map yet has gone a little bit viral: one that includes a dot representing every single vote cast. (Donald Trump put a version of this map on a wall in the White House.) look like a sea of red - never mind that a lot of those rural counties have fewer inhabitants than a single block in Manhattan. shaped by vote population distribution, because, as you recall, Hillary Clinton got 3 million more votes.Ī Republican would then put up a very different map showing all the counties that voted for Trump and making the U.S. You know the ones: A Democrat would post an almost psychedelically stretched-out cartogram of the continental U.S. Photo: Courtesy of Kenneth Field and Īlong with the New York Times’ needle of death, perhaps no infographics are as associated with the 2016 election as voting maps.